Quantcast
Channel: Hamming – 100% Private Proxies – Fast, Anonymous, Quality, Unlimited USA Private Proxy!
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10

Hamming connectivity of regular languages

$
0
0

Call a language $ L$ Hamming connected iff, for every pair of strings $ x, y \in L^2$ , where $ |x|=|y|$ , $ x$ may be transformed into $ y$ by a sequence of single symbol in-place replacements, so that after every replacement, the resulting string is in $ L$ .

Is Hamming connectivity a decidable property for regular languages? Note that the brute-force algorithm of checking all string lengths fails, as $ L$ may contain infinitely many strings.

Example:

Define $ L$ on the binary alphabet to be the set of strings that do not contain $ 101$ or $ 010$ as a substring. $ L$ is regular. We now show that $ L$ is Hamming connected.

Informal Proof: We can grow internal “runs” out to the ends to transform any string in $ L$ into the all 1’s or all 0’s string without creating a forbidden substring, e.g., 001100 -> 011100 -> 111100 -> 111110 -> 111111. This transformation can also be done in reverse to reach any string. Thus, $ L$ is Hamming connected.

The post Hamming connectivity of regular languages appeared first on 100% Private Proxies - Fast, Anonymous, Quality, Unlimited USA Private Proxy!.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>